1. Get our daily digest email where we email the latest new topics from our Strictly Health forum to keep up with the latest developments! Click here to subscribe.

technical question/concern about how acyclovir works

Discussion in 'Your Living Room' started by BayMama, Jul 28, 2014.

  1. BayMama

    BayMama Member

    649
    2
    18
    Jul 12, 2014
    My ENT has just called in a prescription for Acyclovir for me.

    I was looking into how the drug worked. I took a genetics class in college (more than a few years ago :) ) and I still have found the descriptions hard to follow. Though I know that tons of people (many of you) are taking this drug with no side effects, and I learned that it has been around for almost 30 years, I found myself concerned that it is inserting DNA into cells. Of particular concern was the notion of it inserting DNA into my cells, as described on this web site, for example: http://www.herpes.org/treatment-options-for-genital-and-oral-herpes-virus-infections/, with this text:

    How does Acyclovir work? Its actual effect in killing virus has not been definitely proved. Acyclovir has several actions in the test tube. It inhibits the enzymes that copy viral DNA, and it also inhibits the replication of virus. Also, again in the test tube, acyclovir is taken up into the growing chains of viral DNA, causing termination of these chains. Acyclovir seems to be “selectively” taken up by infected cells. Acyclovir is much less toxic for normal cells because less is drug is taken up, less is converted to active form, and normal cell enzymes are less sensitive to the chemical (to paraphrase the PDR online).

    I'd love to know if any of you were also concerned about this, and how you came to peace with it.

    I'm stressed enough about my health already without worrying about my DNA! Or to state it more seriously--I am really trying to keep my stress level as low as possible, so peace of mind is something I seek right now. Thank you.
     
  2. John of Ohio

    John of Ohio Active Member

    775
    121
    43
    May 17, 2014
    There is no evidence whatsoever that acyclovir disrupts normal cellular (human) DNA. Acyclovir does not have any DNA, any nucleotide sequences. The notion that it's inserting DNA into either human or herpes virus genomes is unsupported.

    In the simplest terms, acyclovir interferes with the virus's ability to synthesize new DNA. Inasmuch as that's about all a herpes virus is, a packet of unique DNA that hijacks the human cell and causes it to make more virus DNA and virions (virus particles), stopping the production of viral DNA essentially disables it. (I didn't say "kills it," as viruses are not alive. They are complex packets of enzymes and DNA or RNA that can chemically overtake the control of a human cell.)

    The chemistry is this:
    (http://www.druglib.com/druginfo/acyclovir/description_pharmacology/)

    In vitro, acyclovir triphosphate stops replication of herpes viral DNA. This is accomplished in three ways: 1) competitive inhibition of viral DNA polymerase, 2) incorporation into and termination of the growing viral DNA chain, and 3) inactivation of the viral DNA polymerase. The greater antiviral activity of acyclovir against HSV compared to VZV is due to its more efficient phosphorylation by the viral TK.

    Your DNA is safe. That of viruses is not.

    --John of Ohio
     
  3. Vicki

    Vicki Guest

    You should also know there are several long term studies of acyclovir's safety and efficacy.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12353186
    Valacyclovir for herpes simplex virus infection: long-term safety and sustained efficacy after 20 years' experience with acyclovir.

    Tyring SK1, Baker D, Snowden W.



    Author information



    Abstract

    An extensive clinical trial program combined with 5 years' postmarketing experience with valacyclovir provides evidence of favorable safety and efficacy in herpes simplex virus (HSV) management. Valacyclovir enhances acyclovir bioavailability compared with orally administered acyclovir. Long-term use of acyclovir for up to 10 years for HSV suppression is effective and well tolerated. Acyclovir is also approved for use in children, is available in some countries over the counter in cream formulation for herpes labialis, and has been monitored in over 1000 pregnancies. Safety monitoring data from clinical trials of valacyclovir, involving over 3000 immunocompetent and immunocompromised persons receiving long-term therapy for HSV suppression, were analyzed. Safety profiles of valacyclovir (</=1000 mg/day), acyclovir (800 mg/day), and placebo were similar. Extensive sensitivity monitoring of HSV isolates confirmed a very low rate of acyclovir resistance among immunocompetent subjects (<0.5%). The incidence of resistance among immunocompromised patients remains low at about 5%.

    Long-term suppression of recurrent genital herpes with acyclovir. A 5-year benchmark. Acyclovir Study Group.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8481018
    Goldberg LH1, Kaufman R, Kurtz TO, Conant MA, Eron LJ, Batenhorst RL, Boone GS.



    Author information



    Abstract

    BACKGROUND AND DESIGN:

    This multicenter trial (19 sites) was initiated in 1984 in more than 1100 immunocompetent individuals with a history of frequently recurring genital herpes (mean, > or = 12 episodes per year). The first year of this suppressive therapy trial was placebo controlled, with acyclovir being provided for episodic treatment in both groups. Thereafter, patients were treated with open-label acyclovir suppressive therapy on a long-term basis (400 mg twice daily) to continue to assess its long-term safety and efficacy. Complete data are available on 389 of the 430 patients who began the fifth year of the study.

    RESULTS:

    Patients were seen quarterly for review of diaries and clinical laboratory evaluations. The percentage of patients recurrence free for any 3-month quarter of the fifth year ranged from 86% to 90%. The mean annual number of recurrences per patient declined from 1.7 during the first year to 0.8 during the fifth year of suppressive therapy. The frequency of false prodromes has also decreased over time. More than 20% of the patients receiving suppressive therapy for 5 years have been recurrence free the entire time. The duration of herpetic outbreaks during suppressive therapy has not changed.

    CONCLUSION:

    This study extends the safety and efficacy profile of oral acyclovir in the suppression of genital herpes to 5 years. The majority of the patients were recurrence free on an annual basis during suppressive therapy. Therapy was well tolerated. Acyclovir usage was not associated with serious side effects or cumulative toxicity.
     
  4. June-

    June- Well-Known Member

    1,788
    58
    48
    May 12, 2014
    I have been told by several doctors that these antivirals are generally well tolerated and when needed can by taken for years safely by most people. If you have liver or kidney damage you want to discuss it with your doctor but for most people they are safer than most of the drugs most often prescribed to Menieres patients.
     
  5. BayMama

    BayMama Member

    649
    2
    18
    Jul 12, 2014
    Thank you, everyone.

    I also found this helpful article, which is about Valacyclovir, but also has a lot of information about Acyclovir. I thought I'd put it here too, for anyone else who comes along wondering about this. http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/186/Supplement_1/S40.full
     
  6. nicmger

    nicmger Member

    861
    3
    18
    May 12, 2014
    I think after days/weeks/months of constant ear pressure, ringing, fatigue, etc.....not to mention sudden severe vertigo attacks lasting hours - it is (to me) easier to "come to peace" with potential side effects. Especially if it is something that can address the other issues. Just my thoughts though and everyone is different.

    For the record, I have been doing pretty well since I started Valtrex.
     
  7. Vicki

    Vicki Guest

    awesome nicmger! Fingers crossed it continues.
     

Share This Page